The Treasury has admitted that stamp duty ‘take’ is expected to soar from £11.2 billion this year to £17.8 billion in 2020/21 - a forecast that underpins the latest three per cent duty surcharge announced last week by Chancellor George Osborne.
The figures were contained in papers released after Osborne’s recent Autumn Statement. They are based not only on the surcharge income but on additional stamp duty raised as a result of the more fundamental overhaul of the system announced by Osborne almost exactly a year ago.
However, that is still some £2.8 billion less in stamp duty receipts than had been expected when the Office for Budget Responsibility had issued an estimate for the same period back in July - the slowing London market is said to be responsible for the recalculation.
These figures are disputed by some in the estate agency industry.
For example, high end London agency Chestertons claims the 2014 stamp duty overhaul will cost the Treasury up to £750m in lost revenue this year alone. The agency claims the new rates have impacted sales over £1.4m, brought parts of the high-end market to a near-standstill, and is having an unintended impact in lower price brackets as developers find it more difficult to subsidise the building of starter homes.
“By ignoring urgent industry calls to review last year’s changes to stamp duty, the Chancellor is burying his head in the sand and will likely be in for a shock when the final year’s receipts are counted and he realises how much the new regime is costing the Treasury” according to Chestertons chief executive Robert Bartlett.
“The Chancellor said his new second homes or buy to let levy on top of stamp duty would raise £1 billion for the Exchequer by 2021, but extra revenue is completely obliterated by the losses over that same period” Bartlett says.
Adrian Owen, Head of Residential Consulting at BNP Paribas Real Estate, says there may also be an unintended disadvantage for those involved in the sale and construction of new-build homes.
“Simply put, without investors there will be far fewer housing starts in London. Investors buy off plan, and this is essential for developers whose banking mandates require at least 30 per cent of properties to be sold before funding can be drawn down that enables them to begin construction” he says, adding that around 60 per cent of new homes in London are bought by investors.
.png)
.png)
Join the conversation
Jump to latest comment and add your reply
So Chesterton's dont feel that Sky-High prices put the brakes on property sales?
(To say nothing about the ''lack of stock'' we all keep hearing about.)
I am always interested to see the rationale behind such claims as 'treasury to lose £750m in Stamp Duty'; such rationale must be directly related to the 'Stamp Duty Effect' and not just slowing sales in particular. Mr Bartlett please do send your calculations.....Oh hang on I just re-read, it does say ''up to £750m'' - you are off the hook.
If we actually had a serious, extensive and well-managed housebuilding programme, where truly affordable housing was built and gimmicky policies like Help to Buy and Right to Buy were scrapped, then maybe we wouldn't need so many investors/buy-to-letters to provide the housing that is so badly needed.
I don't understand the endless whining from investors and the buy-to-let brigade that they are being treated harshly by Osborne. Spare a thought for those people who are struggling to get on the property ladder, spare a thought for those people who have given up on that dream altogether, spare a thought for Generation Rent - priced out of buying and forced to pay obscene rents for substandard accommodation.
Might be naive and idealistic of me, but can't we return to a situation where housing is a basic right rather than an investment? As agents on here have repeatedly said, a lack of supply combined with soaring house prices is a toxic mix that isn't going to do much good in the long-term.
Please login to comment