An online estate agency which last week claimed it had resolved a dispute over reviews it showed on its website is now the subject of new complaints to Trustpilot and the Advertising Standards Authority.
Emoov - now owned by PropTech firm Mashroom - was the subject of an earlier complaint some months ago to the ASA.
This concerned reviews on the website which were praising the agency but which actually referred to the company when it was owned and operated by different personnel, unconnected with Mashroom.
The chief operating officer of Mashroom, former Purplebricks local property expert Naveen Jaspal, issued a statement a week ago saying: “The claims made in the recent news were resolved last month, and we worked closely with the ASA to ensure that we complied fully with their request.”
However the person behind the original complaint to the ASA - Andrew Stanton, who runs the property consultancy Estate Agencies Insight Strategies - says that Emoov has not resolved the issues at all.
What he calls “fake reviews” remain in place, even though they relate to the performance of another company with different staff.
The ASA originally asked Emoov to remove from its website three things:
- the homepage claim that the agency was "rated the UK's No.1 Hybrid Estate Agent for the past 3 years” because for most of that time the agency was operated by different personnel and under different ownership;
- the inclusion on the site of Trustpilot reviews from prior to the change of ownership; and
- the inclusion of reviews and ratings in the overall ‘count’ expressed on the website relating to the agency’s performance.
Although the “UK No.1 Hybrid” claim has disappeared, when Estate Agent Today checked last evening there were still over 2,000 reviews on Trustpilot relating to the old owners, accessed via the Emoov site.
To the casual reader, it would appear impossible to tell which reviews related to the new owners and which to the old.
The current Emoov website also claims to have 2,174 reviews broken down into Excellent, Great, Average, Poor and Bad - but Stanton contents that 2,174 figure is far in excess of the number of clients Emoov has had since passing into new ownership, indicating that the old reviews relating to the different company are still being included.
Stanton has contacted Trustpilot’s compliance unit, warning the firm that it risks being indirectly in contravention of the ASA’s guideline to Emoov, and advising it to contact the agency to resolve the matter. The review company has so far sent only a holding reply, saying it is dealing with the issue.
Stanton has also been in touch once again with the ASA, which is also considering next steps.
Emoov has been asked for its comments on the latest complaints.
You can see last week's story on the original issue involving Emoov and the ASA here.
.png)
.png)
Join the conversation
Jump to latest comment and add your reply
If you look at the one star reviews you will note that Mashroom have stated that they don't refer to the new Company (see below). Strange they haven't done the same with the 5 star reviews!!
**INCORRECT DATE. THIS IS NOT A REVIEW OF THE CURRENT EMOOV COMPANY BY A CURRENT CUSTOMER**
Hi there HL, we are sorry to hear about your experience with the previous Emoov company and totally understand your need to vent your frustration. Rest assured we are not that same company you dealt with, hence why we have added the clarification so that readers know that your review belongs to the previous company and not to us. The new emoov is fully up and running under the ownership of Mashroom Ltd as of January. We are proud to offer an amazing level of customer service. We are, however, sorry to hear of your previous troubles. Wishing you all the best, Amy and the new emoov team.
Please login to comment