Moving with the times? Average owner moves home every...

The average British homeowner stays in their property for 20.8 years, according to new research by Zoopla.

The property portal analysed the average turnover of local properties at local authority level across the UK to find out the typical number of years a homeowner occupies a property before moving.

The least frequent movers are those residing in Kensington and Chelsea - one of the most expensive areas in the country - who typically up sticks once every 35.5 years.
Other long-term occupants include those in Brent (35.4 years), Enfield (34.9), Ealing (32.3) and Redbridge (32.2).

The majority of districts where homeowners move least frequently are situated in London, with Oxford (31.2 years) being the only location outside the capital in the top ten.

However, the top ten districts of households moving the most frequently is more varied geographically. In joint top spot comes Dartford in the South East and South Derbyshire in the East Midlands, where the typical homeowner moves every 15 years on average.

These districts are followed by Salford (15.2 years), East Lothian (15.6), Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole and North West Leicestershire (both 15.7).

"These results contradict a common assumption that UK neighbourhoods are becoming more transient," says Laura Howard, spokesperson for Zoopla.

"They show that, once you’ve managed to buy a property to call home and set down roots in an area, there can be little motivation to move again."

Howard says that while many owners will still be keen to improve their lot, exponentially rising house prices have made it hard for people to move up the ladder frequently.

"For agents the often-lengthy spells between homeowners moving underlines the importance of building a strong and enduring reputation in the community – for example, having excellent knowledge of the local property market and being reliable and transparent," she says.

"A solid local reputation coupled with consistent and relevant communication will put agents at front of mind when homeowners eventually do make that life-changing decision to sell up and move on."

"Forward-looking agents will also ensure they provide current renters – often prospective first-time buyers – with an excellent customer experience, including offering information and guidance, with a view to securing their custom and loyalty further down the line," adds Howard.

Top 10 least frequent movers

	District	Region	Turnover in years between moves
1	Kensington and Chelsea	London	35.5
2	Brent	London	35.4
3	Enfield	London	34.9
4	Ealing	London	32.3
5	Redbridge	London	32.2
6	Haringey	London	31.5
7	Oxford	South East	31.2
8	Harrow	London	30.9
9	Westminster	London	30.6
10	Camden	London	29.3

Top 10 most frequent movers

	District	Region	Turnover in years between moves
1	Dartford	South East	15.0
1	South Derbyshire	East Midlands	15.0
2	Salford	North West	15.2
3	East Lothian	Scotland	15.6
4	Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole	South West	15.7
4	North West Leicestershire	East Midlands	15.7
5	Daventry	East Midlands	16.0
5	Tewkesbury	South West	16.0
6	Midlothian	Scotland	16.3
7	Renfrewshire	Scotland	16.6

Regional frequency of moves

	Region	Turnover in years between moves
1	East Midlands	17.9
2	Scotland	18.7
3	South West	19.5
4	West Midlands	20.5
5	Yorkshire and the Humber	20.6
6	North West	20.6
7	East of England	21.0
8	North East	21.0
9	Wales	22.2
10	South East	25.4
11	London	26.2
	Great Britain	20.8

05 July 2019 14:02 PM

Well as you suggest you have a thorough knowledge of the effects of SDLT being as you are directly at the coalface.
It is the opinions of professionals like you that might ultimately produce sane housing policies.
But we have a long way to travel yet.
I suppose the big question is what will replace SDLT receipts?
To remove substantial tax revenue has to be replaced by other tax revenue unless replaced by more borrowing.
I suppose it might be possible that with a lowering of CT more CT will ultimately be received.Laffer Curve and all that!
But this is far from certain.
So in removing SDLT up to a certain point what might replace that lost revenue.
This is a very political point.
But as you are only probably too aware there are many impediments that restrict unnecessarily the easy sale and purchase of property.
Such impediments do not make for a free flowing market.
There is NO economic benefit in having these restrictions.
The economy needs a far more effective property management system.
It is currently dysfunctional which does nobody any favours.
When you think about if desired it can be possible to exchange and complete in 10 days if the willing is there.
Having such a speedy process would revolutionise the way property of all types is utilised.
Unfortunately I believe there are many vested interests that do NOT want a more effective property management process.