The marketing campaigns – which really ramped up last year before a series of scandals hit the agency – took the lion’s share of the blame, with Marston saying they ‘did not capture the benefits of our offer’.
She said that, although the budget for marketing grew significantly over the last year, ‘its effectiveness was poor’.
Marston wrote in her statement: “We moved away from shouting about our low fixed fee and launched the ‘SOLD’ national advertising campaign. We missed the opportunity of communicating our key differentiator in a market that was seeing significant rises in house prices, and where our model could have saved consumers thousands in commission.”
She said the firm’s approach to marketing will be radically different this year to help achieve better results.
With regards to field sales in the year to April 2022, she said: “Last year our sales execution was inconsistent, with variable levels of performance and insufficient thought given to targeting customers where our proposition would be most successful. We were also too slow to adjust our field force to align with the fall in instructions which saw us carry unnecessary costs in the year.”
But she insisted that transitioning to a fully-employed model was allowing Purplebricks to gain ‘greater control of our field’, while she also welcomed the diversifying of the workforce.
She also spoke about pricing, and how the Classic and Pro packages were well-received by customers, but the impact of the Money Back Guarantee – scrapped last month at the same time as fees were raised – had been far below what the early trials had indicated.
What is the recovery plan?
In her statement accompanying the results, Marston regularly made clear her desire and determination to turn the struggling brand around.
While recognising that significant challenges lie ahead, she also insisted the company now has the right plan in place, ‘one which will change the direction of travel and deliver significant improvements, with a return to growth’.
“We expect positive cash generation in early FY24 and retain significant headroom in our cash resources,” she said.
The plan is centred on four key objectives. First up, managing costs, with Marston insisting that the company will remove £13 million from its cost base during FY23, equivalent to a 16% reduction. Marketing will also be focused on smarter, more targeted investments, she said.
There is also an ambition to grow and diversify revenues, with ‘significant progress’ apparently already made towards the launch of a new mortgage proposition.
“While our absolute priority today is to improve the financial performance of the business, I cannot ignore the opportunity to explore future revenue streams, whether that be through monetising our data, selling additional home moving products and services, or potential commercial partnerships. We will continue to evaluate these opportunities so that we can move quickly and confidently when the time is right,” she said.
The third plank of the recovery plan is growing instructions, moving away from an everything for everyone proposition – which Marston insists is ‘neither efficient or effective’ – and towards a more targeted approach to winning customers.
Interestingly, the fourth part of the plan is about raising standards, which some might interpret as a dig at those previously in charge of the brand.
Marston say she is focused on creating ‘a high-performance culture’ at Purplebricks that ‘delivers amazing customer experiences whether online or off-line’.
“We have learnt from our past mistakes and now regularly review our processes and procedures to ensure we are delivering on our obligations to our customers. We are strengthening our compliance capability and, where possible, we continue to automate our processes,” she said.
During a live video presentation of the results yesterday morning, Marston also bemoaned a previous focus on fame over results. “We spent too much time chasing fame and not enough chasing customers,” she claimed.
Despite the challenges and poor set of annual results, Marston remains upbeat about the future.
“The path ahead is challenging,” she admitted, “but our clear recovery plan to improve business performance and cash generation is well under way. We have taken quick and decisive action in line with our plans to drive higher instructions, grow revenues, re-set our cost base and raise standards.”
She concluded: “While we expect the supply dynamics in the housing market to remain challenging, and the macroeconomic environment is increasingly uncertain, I am confident that the actions we have taken alongside our sales and marketing plans will deliver revenue of £67.5-72.5 million in FY23, driven by instruction growth in the second half of the year, a further improvement in ARPI, and a return to positive cash generation in early FY24, with significant headroom in our cash resources.”
The battle for Purplebricks itself also continued to rage yesterday, with Paul Pindar - non-executive chairman of the firm - seemingly attempting to shore up his position by purchasing 2,500,000 ordinary shares of £0.01 each in the company. As a result of this purchase, Paul Pindar and his wife Sharon now together hold more than 14 million shares representing a 4.59% stake in the company.
Pindar has come under pressure in recent months from activist investor Adam Smith, who through his investment vehicle Lecram Holdings has increased his stake in the company to above 4% (4.2%) and called for Pindar to go.
Glenn Cooper, chairman of Harrier Capital, an advisor to Lecram Holdings, said: “The dreadful Purplebricks results show the extent of the challenge faced by the company. The leadership of Purplebricks has admitted to errors in its marketing, lettings, customer conversion, employment model and failed expansion into Germany, with the result that over £30m of shareholder funds were wasted in the last financial year."
He added: "While we are encouraged by the plans of the new CEO and CFO to turn things around and stem the cash bleed, we wonder why it has taken so long to act and are concerned that the lack of market experience at board level, and the fact that the chairman who presided over this terrible performance is still at the helm on the company.
“We will be meeting the company later this month and will reiterate our call for a change of chairman, and our willingness to take action to bring about this change.”
An urgent shareholder meeting can be held if 5% of shareholders in a company request one.
Estate Agent Today carried out a poll on LinkedIn, which strongly suggests that Purplebricks will not be able to bring about a turnaround in its fortunes.
Join the conversation
Jump to latest comment and add your reply
You could not make it up, a CEO who has never worked as an estate agent, running a national estate agency business, and I do not think being a CPO (whatever that is) qualifies.
Countrywide PLC made the same mistake, employing Alison Platt as CEO also with zero agency experience, she managed to oversee a 90% fall in the company's share price, mortally wounding it, which led to it being acquired by the Connells group, who with a c-suite full of real estate professionals just did what they did best - run the business efficently.
Last year Purplebricks made a post tax profit of 3.9M - most of that being cash from selling off their Canadian concern for over 2M, so a one off cashfillet. This year it made a 42M loss, on a turnover of 70M, down from the 90M turnover of the previous year.
If Helena Marston feels that all the problems are behind her, and a few comforting words will turn it all around, well in my opinion as an analyst who has been following Purplebricks since its inception - she is probably in for a rude awakening.
If an online agent can not thrive in a pandemic, the very best conditions to do agency, then this version of being an onliner is clearly not working.
As to the USP being that Purplebricks is cheap, again the new CEO needs to get a grip of the figures, at the start it used to charge £849 including VAT to 'list' a property with a hope that it would sell, today the minimum fee has increased so substantially that the public in some areas would actually pay less for a traditional full service agent with premises.
Purplebricks as a brand is known everywhere - no surprise, if any agent in the UK had spent multi-millions on TV, radio, digital marketing, and sponsored the Olymics its brand would also be out there, but cut that advertising spend ... and the brand within six months will be invisible, that was always the case - they may not have physical offices like many agents, so no cost there, but the cost of keeping front of mind is obviously higher than having an office.
Is Purplebricks doomed - in its present incarnation - well yes, could it be saved, yes all businesses can be saved, my door is always open - though wisdom is of course a very expensive commodity.
A last thought, does the millennial have an appetite for a digital online type of service? Yes, we can see that with OpenRent in the rental sector it will list probably 260,000 tenancies this year, dwarfing the amount of property listed by any 'agent' - why? well it is not even an agent but allows the tech savvy public a way to list their property assets without an agent.
This is a crazy release she has allowed to go out if she doesn’t increase customer numbers she has neither found fame or customers. I’m sure Alison Platt has just changed her name she spouted the same crap when she joined countrywide and we all know how that ended up. I’m still sure it’s a set up. Put someone in control who has no chance to make the next person look better. Despite their faults at least wainwright and the Bruce’s knew the business of estate agency. She talks about expansion and increasing revenue but they should just focus on the core business of sales Lettings and backhanders from PPL, Maybe Chuck in a few mortgages too as I’m sure they don’t focus enough on mortgage and Lettings at the moment
Will there be a new Marketing Director appointment anytime soon? The bar has been set so low that there are numerous candidates, more than capable of making a difference.
Please login to comment